The real problem with the climate-change is how quickly it has become politicized -- or possibly "religion-ized."
I admit that I am surprised by that development, but not in a good way.
Unfortunately, doom-and-gloom is a standby of environmental writing (sometimes with reason--Dust Bowl, anyone?). You can get books analyzing such writing, which has always leaned towards the jeremiad more than the celebration.
When the doom does not occur exactly as predicted, however, the skeptics say, "Oh, there was nothing to that.
As the Times (UK) points out, exaggerated claims of doom don't help the work of environmental cleanup.
Excessive statements about the decline of Arctic sea ice, severe weather events and the probability of extreme warming in the next century detract from the credibility of robust findings about climate change, they said.
Such claims can easily be rebutted by critics of global warming science to cast doubt on the whole field. They also confuse the public about what has been established as fact, and what is conjecture.
Short-term fund-raising goals by environmental groups are one big reason for the exaggeration.